annexure 01 - rehabilitation of cinema theatres in post-industrial mumbai

by PANKAJ JOSHI #

With the decline of the textile mills and their eventual closure, the manufacturing industry shifted out of the city, followed by a huge expansion of the service industry. This shift is predominantly visible in forms of consumption as well as forms of the corresponding built fabric. This changed the way Mumbai functions now as opposed to the pre-1990’s phase. This change is not a static long-term phenomenon but a transitionary city phase where a predominantly industrial/ manufacturing city evolves into a post-industrial service hub and continues to morph from the predominant finance function to a hybrid mix of financial services, informal/ formal services and cultural industry economy of media and film, advertising, printing and its myriad different forms. 

This shift is also seen very evidently in the public culture and imagination of the city with its direct impact on the consumptive spaces such as the local eateries, cinema theatres and drama houses, shopping centres, music and dance based public events, advertising and media platforms, heritage and environment; shifting from the iconicity of the single to the genericity of the multiple. This list is unending and while it may seem apocalyptic, urban theorists argue that these city phases are the real testing grounds for public culture to demonstrate its grit and perseverance. However, the lopsided and often deceitful dominance of the enabling environment against public culture spaces has its worst effect in the erasure of single cinema theatres in Mumbai.

The city economy, especially the informal economy, behaves akin to molten lead in a sand cast which readily and rapidly moulds itself to the grain of the cast. Whereas the physical city with its real estate languor resists, denies, distorts and slowly forges to come to terms with this post service industry economy and wakes up to a cultural industry economy. As the city grapples with the pressure of this morph, the resultant collateral damage seems to be the cultural spaces which are not being able to survive the onslaught of the existing service economy and its artificial ethos. The dilemma in this transitory phase of the city is that if we are not able to retain the cultural spaces, then the city would find it extremely difficult to reorganize its critical capacities, create new capacities and provide the necessary incubatory support for the newly emerging phase of cultural industry economy of Mumbai. Loss of the cinema theatre sites/ buildings also equates to the loss of imageability in the city. Cinema theatres have been and are, major landmarks in Mumbai. Most of their locations are major nodes in cities - for eg. Metro Cinema junction, Bahar bus stop, Bharatmata signal etc. Taking a cue from Kevin Lynch’s seminal work Image of the City (1960), it can be affirmed that users understand their surroundings in consistent and predictable ways formatting mental maps using five elements - paths, edges, districts, nodes and landmarks. Therefore, the loss of these landmarks would definitely affect the imageability of the city and wayfinding in it. These losses would definitely deprive Mumbai of its visual city-form and community character. 

Are Single Screen Cinema Theatres Culturally Significant? #

Cinema theatres as a space for inclusive public culture is very well documented in various ways. However does it stand scrutiny to the criteria for listing these sites/ buildings as culturally significant or heritage buildings/ sites? We can examine the sites of single screen cinema theatres against this criterion for listing as prescribed by DCR no.67 (Development control regulations for Greater Mumbai 1991)

3a - value for architectural, historical or cultural reasons: A

Architectural A (arc)

Historical A (his)

Cultural A (cul)

3b - the date and/ or period or design and/ or unique use of the building: B 

Period B (per)

Design B (des)

Use B (use)

3c - Relevance to social and economic history: C

Social History C (sh)

Economic History C (eh)

3d - Association with well-known persons or events: D

Persons/ Events D (bio)

3e - A building or groups of buildings and/ or areas of a distinct architectural design and/ or style, historic period or way of life having sociological interest and/ or community value: E

Community Value E (cv)

3f - The unique value of a building or architectural features or artefact and/ or being part of a chain of architectural development that would be broken if it were lost: F

Architectural Features F (af)

3h - Represents forms of technological development: H

Technological Developments H (tec)

It is evident from this list that cinema theatres do qualify under several criteria for listing a heritage site and based on these criterion they can be listed as Grade I (as prime landmarks of Mumbai), Grade II (regionally or locally important landmarks of Mumbai) and Grade III (determines the character of the locality etc.) heritage buildings in Greater Mumbai. Listing of these sites will enhance the imageablity of these buildings and empower them with incentives that are proposed to be applicable to Heritage Sites/ buildings in Greater Mumbai. An additional advantage of listing these sites is that owners can change the user status of the balance property for financial gain, enabling them to sustain the theatre. Moreover the proposed incentives for listed heritage sites may enable the theatre owners to avail Heritage TDR for balance and bonus development rights, Heritage TDR for repair, waivers in property tax and local authority charges as well as avail soft loans for maintenance and part adaptive reuse of the cinema theatre sites.

Development Planning and Cinema Theatres #

The Development Plan for Mumbai is the single largest and the most important planning activity which affects the city over a long period across generations (although a Development Plan is effective for 20 years the preparation and finalisation does stretch the period to more than 30 years) The revision of the Development plan for 2014-34 is ongoing following an intervention by more than 100 civil society groups, institutions and organisations. The opening up of the plan process also brought to light the omnipresent fact that the amenities in the city are woefully inadequate and would not be anywhere near national standards in the plan period. 

Cinema theatres are one of the most important catalysts for the sustainability of a neighbourhood as well as for making of a city-level public realm. This public realm is not just in terms of physical amenity, but it also assists in building a city’s imagination and identity. These sarvajanik (open to all/ no differential treatment for caste, class, creed, community and gender) public spaces are an essential part of the creation of amenity space. The earlier Development Plan (1967 & 2001) had recognised this amenity had recognised this amenity potential them under the category of city level amenity. These cinema theatres were structured organically on the dominant demography of city localities. The same would have to be followed for the revision of the Development Plan for 2014-34. Mumbai had 70 cinema theatres for the population of 29,94,020 by 1951, the standard ratio of 1 cinema theatre per 1,00,000 people (the standard of 1 cinema theatre for a population of 1,00,000 is prescribed by the Urban Development Plan Formulation and Implementation/ UDPFI Guidelines 2006, Ministry of Urban Affairs, Government of India for all Development Plans in India) was adequately met, with each theatre catering to a locality of approximately 43,000 people. But in 2011 Mumbai had only 76 single screen cinema theatres for the population of 1,25,00,000. This ratio since then escalated to 1 cinema theatre per 1,64,473 people. 

This inadequacy can be corrected if the plots earmarked for/ as cinema theatres in the development plan 1981-2001 (sanctioned period 1993-2013) continue with added incentive to adaptively reuse the plots, buildings and the augmented potential on the same site and/ or in the same area/ ward. Identifying the culturally significant sites/ buildings and providing financial legislative support to them as a significant heritage site would definitely assist and improve their longevity. The revision of the Development Plan for 2014-34 should, through land use zoning, reservation of plots and mixed-use-mechanism, aim to achieve at least the standards prescribed in UDPFI 2006. An atmosphere comprising of an enabling environment, financial incentives, legislative amendments and local authority/ state authority support will ensure that the single screen cinema theatres make a smooth transition into Mumbai’s future and will retain their unique characteristic of being a public space, first and foremost.


Reproduced from Cinema Theatres in Bombay / Mumbai A Dossier | Published by Urban Design Research Institute and MAJLIS | Mumbai, Dated September 2014 | Pg. Nos. 65 to 71 for review against JOSHI vs UNNI, a mini-series on ideas about Mumbai’s development by two of its most quoted architect-activists between 2012 & ‘16

 
2
Kudos
 
2
Kudos

Now read this

social amenities; imagining a mumbai cultural policy

Possibility of a city policy on culture is a derivative of two conferences of note the city hosted in the recent past. One held in 1992 at the SNDT Women’s University and 12years later the other in 2004 at Asiatic Library. Both these... Continue →